Using the McMurray Test to Diagnose Knee Injuries and ACL Tears
Insights

Using the McMurray Test to Diagnose Knee Injuries and ACL Tears

Eleanor Hayes

Introduction

Knee injuries are among the most common reasons people seek medical attention, especially those who play sports or lead active lifestyles. Of all the possible knee injuries , meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures occur frequently and require accurate diagnosis for proper care. The McMurray test—a classic knee examination technique—is often used to detect meniscal injuries. But what happens if someone also has an ACL tear? Can the McMurray test still provide reliable information, or does it become less dependable? In this article, we look at the complexities of using the McMurray test when ACL injuries are present and explain why a comprehensive approach is so important for getting the diagnosis right.

What Is the McMurray Test and How Does It Work?

The McMurray test is a hands-on exam performed by a healthcare provider to check for meniscal tears inside the knee. During the test, the examiner bends the knee and rotates the lower leg both inward and outward while straightening the knee. A “positive” McMurray test occurs when this motion results in a distinct click, a sensation of catching, or pain—signs that suggest a meniscal injury.

Although this test has been a mainstay in knee exams for years, its accuracy isn’t perfect. Research has shown that the McMurray test is quite specific (it’s good at confirming a tear when it finds one), but it’s not particularly sensitive and can miss many true meniscal injuries . For example, one study found a sensitivity of 58.5% and a specificity of 93.4%, meaning it can rule in a tear but not reliably rule one out. Sometimes, it may even show a “positive” result because of other knee issues , not just meniscal damage. Of note, only a 'thud' felt on the medial (inner) part of the knee was strongly linked to an actual meniscus tear —with very high specificity (98%) but low sensitivity (16%), meaning it rarely occurs but is quite meaningful when it does. These findings show the strengths and clear limitations of the McMurray test. Essentially, it should be used as one piece of the puzzle, not as the sole method of diagnosis .

Free non-medical discussion

Not sure what to do next?

Book a Discovery Call

Information only · No medical advice or diagnosis.

Why ACL Tears Complicate the Diagnosis

Things get trickier when a patient has an ACL tear in addition to (or instead of) a meniscal injury. The ACL is crucial for knee stability , and if it’s torn, the knee can become “loose” or unstable. This instability can change the way the joint moves, which sometimes masks or mimics the symptoms usually detected during the McMurray test. That means a damaged ACL could either hide a meniscal tear or make a healthy meniscus seem injured.

The situation gets even more complicated when unusual symptoms appear. For example, research has documented that sometimes the pain or clicking appears on the opposite side of the knee than expected, especially with certain types of meniscus tears . These “paradoxical” findings can make diagnosis much more challenging, especially if both the meniscus and ACL are injured.

Interestingly, examiner experience does not always guarantee an accurate result. Even skilled clinicians may miss or misinterpret what they feel or hear during the McMurray test, especially when more than one injury is present.

That’s why clinicians rarely rely on the McMurray test alone when an ACL injury is suspected. Other physical examinations—like the Lachman test and the anterior drawer test—are specifically designed to detect ACL tears . For example, with the Lachman test, the clinician gently pulls the lower leg forward; excessive movement compared to the other knee strongly points to an ACL tear. Using a combination of these tests makes for a more accurate diagnosis, allowing the examiner to distinguish between meniscal and ACL injuries or to identify if both exist.

A Combined Approach: Physical Exams and Imaging

Relying solely on the McMurray test when an ACL tear might be present can lead to missed or delayed diagnoses, which can affect a patient’s treatment plan and recovery. That’s why clinicians use a combination of physical tests and, when available, imaging studies like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI is especially helpful because it shows detailed images of the soft tissues, making it much easier to identify tears in the meniscus , ACL, or both.

When MRI is not available right away, a thorough physical exam using several different tests remains the best option. If the McMurray test is positive, it should trigger further investigation, rather than being taken as proof on its own. This approach helps ensure that patients get the right diagnosis and the treatment they need.

Conclusion

The McMurray test remains a valuable tool for detecting meniscal injuries , but its limitations become especially clear when ACL tears are in the picture. Since an ACL injury can change knee stability and the way the joint moves, a positive McMurray test does not always provide the full answer. To avoid mistakes, healthcare professionals should always use multiple clinical tests along with imaging when possible. This comprehensive approach leads to more accurate diagnoses and better results for patients who have complex knee injuries . As research progresses, our ability to diagnose and treat these problems will continue to improve, helping more people get back to an active life.

References

Corea, J. R., Moussa, M., & Othman, A. (1994). McMurray's test tested. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 2(2), 70-72.
Kim, S.-J., Min, B.-H., & Han, D.-Y. (1996). Paradoxical phenomena of the McMurray Test. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400115
Evans, P. J., Bell, G. D., & Frank, C. (1993). Prospective evaluation of the McMurray test. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 21(4), 604-608.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • The McMurray test is specific but not very sensitive, meaning it can confirm a meniscal tear but may miss several. Its reliability decreases if an ACL tear is also present, as ACL injuries can mask or mimic meniscal symptoms. Therefore, additional tests and clinical expertise are crucial for accurate diagnosis.
  • A comprehensive approach, which includes multiple physical tests and sometimes imaging such as MRI, leads to more accurate diagnoses. This is because single tests like the McMurray cannot always distinguish between meniscal and ACL injuries. The London Cartilage Clinic uses advanced protocols to ensure every patient receives the most precise evaluation possible.
  • Prof Lee has extensive experience in diagnosing and managing knee injuries, especially when both meniscus and ACL are involved. His expertise in combining advanced clinical assessments with modern imaging ensures tailored treatment plans, aiming for the best outcomes for each patient at the London Cartilage Clinic.
  • The London Cartilage Clinic is renowned for its comprehensive, patient-centred approach. Led by Prof Lee, it offers advanced diagnostic techniques and access to the latest imaging technology. Patients benefit from personalised care plans, ensuring that even complex cases are managed with the highest professional standards and expertise.
  • If knee pain, clicking, or instability persists, especially following an injury, further evaluation is advisable. The McMurray test is only one part of a thorough assessment. At the London Cartilage Clinic, patients receive comprehensive diagnostics to precisely identify the issue and discuss suitable treatment options tailored to their needs.

Legal & Medical Disclaimer

This article is written by an independent contributor and reflects their own views and experience, not necessarily those of London Cartilage Clinic. It is provided for general information and education only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Always seek personalised advice from a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health. London Cartilage Clinic accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions, third-party content, or any loss, damage, or injury arising from reliance on this material.

If you believe this article contains inaccurate or infringing content, please contact us at [email protected].

Last reviewed: 2026For urgent medical concerns, contact your local emergency services.

London Cartilage Clinic

Ready to explore your options?

Our consultant-led team specialises in cartilage repair, regeneration and replacement — tailored to your diagnosis and long-term goals.

Specialist-led care66 Harley StreetPersonalised treatment plans

Will the Arthrosamid work for me

PAAG-8+ Questionnaire

A bright, structured entry point for patients exploring Arthrosamid. The questionnaire helps frame suitability, expectations, and 24-month clinical benefit discussion before a fuller consultant-led review.

Designed for shared decision-making. It does not replace specialist consultation, examination, imaging review, or formal medical advice.

London Cartilage Clinic

Latest Insights

Clinical updates, cartilage treatment guidance, and recovery-focused articles from our specialist team.

ChondroFiller for Effective Cartilage Regeneration
Eleanor Hayes

ChondroFiller for Effective Cartilage Regeneration

ChondroFiller is an innovative collagen-based treatment designed to support natural cartilage repair by providing a biodegradable scaffold for the body's own cells to regenerate damaged tissue. This acellular, type I collagen gel encourages growth of essential type II cartilage, promoting effective healing without introducing foreign cells or drugs. Clinical studies demonstrate ChondroFiller's safety, biocompatibility, and significant improvements in pain relief and joint function. For optimal outcomes, treatment should be managed by experienced specialists like Professor Paul Lee at the London Cartilage Clinic, who combine advanced therapies with personalized rehabilitation. ChondroFiller offers a promising option for patients with small to medium cartilage defects, enhancing mobility and quality of life through natural regeneration.

Knee Cartilage Replacement Gels for Osteoarthritis Relief
Knee
Eleanor Hayes

Knee Cartilage Replacement Gels for Osteoarthritis Relief

Knee cartilage replacement gels, including hyaluronic acid and collagen-based injections, offer a non-surgical treatment option for mild to moderate osteoarthritis. These gels mimic natural joint lubrication and cushioning, reducing pain and improving mobility by decreasing friction and absorbing shocks. While they do not regenerate cartilage, clinical studies show symptom relief lasting several months to a year. Precise injection techniques enhance effectiveness, and patient selection is crucial for optimal outcomes. Typically well-tolerated, the injection procedure involves minimal discomfort and manageable aftercare. Clinics like the London Cartilage Clinic provide expert assessments to tailor treatment plans and set realistic expectations. Patients should consult healthcare professionals to determine suitability and receive personalized advice for managing osteoarthritis symptoms with cartilage gel injections.

Ankle Cartilage Damage Symptoms Treatment and Recovery
Ankle
Eleanor Hayes

Ankle Cartilage Damage Symptoms Treatment and Recovery

Ankle cartilage is vital for joint cushioning and mobility but is prone to damage from injuries or wear. Early symptoms like pain and swelling are often subtle, making diagnosis challenging without imaging such as MRI. Treatment ranges from conservative methods like rest and physical therapy to advanced surgical options, including cartilage repair and regeneration. Recovery varies but emphasizes rehabilitation and lifestyle modifications to prevent further harm. Innovations like stem cell therapy promise future improvements in cartilage care. Expert evaluation ensures personalized, effective management to maintain ankle health and function.

Privacy & Cookies Policy