CartiHeal Agili-C · Treatment comparison

CartiHeal vs knee replacement

CartiHeal is joint-preserving surgery for selected focal cartilage or osteochondral defects. Knee replacement resurfaces broad worn joint surfaces with metal and polyethylene. These treatments usually serve different patterns and stages of disease.

CartiHeal · joint preserved
Knee replacement · surfaces replaced
Matched knee illustrations comparing a successfully remodelled focal CartiHeal repair with metal and polyethylene total knee replacement
Illustrative successful outcomes for two very different indications. Individual healing and function vary; this image is explanatory, not a prediction.

Quick answer

CartiHeal preserves the knee while treating selected focal joint-surface lesions. Knee replacement resurfaces a compartment or the whole joint and is often more appropriate for diffuse severe arthritis. CartiHeal is not a universal way to avoid replacement.

Verified across three networks

Trusted by patients on Doctify, Google and Top Doctors

Different scale of treatment

CartiHeal repairs a selected site; replacement resurfaces a joint compartment or knee

CartiHeal is designed around one or more contained cartilage or osteochondral lesions within its indication. It preserves the native joint surfaces outside the treated site and relies on biological integration and remodelling.

Partial or total knee replacement removes and resurfaces worn joint surfaces using metal and polyethylene components. Replacement is a different operation for a different distribution and severity of disease.

Scale of surgery

Focal biological repair or prosthetic resurfacing

CartiHeal

Selected lesion repair

  • Treats one or more focal osteochondral sites
  • Keeps native surfaces outside the prepared area
  • Relies on biological integration and remodelling

Knee replacement

Compartment or whole-joint resurfacing

  • Removes worn joint surfaces at a broader scale
  • Uses metal and polyethylene components
  • Creates a mechanical prosthetic articulation

Preservation factors

When focal repair may remain credible

Localised disease

Symptoms plausibly relate to a contained, treatable joint-surface lesion.

Workable mechanics

Alignment, stability and meniscus can support the repair strategy.

Supportive bone

Bone quality and the surrounding joint allow focal reconstruction.

Realistic rehabilitation

Protected loading and long progression can be completed safely.

When preservation may remain credible

A focal lesion in a mechanically workable knee is not the same as end-stage arthritis

CartiHeal may enter the discussion when symptoms can reasonably be linked to treatable joint-surface lesions and alignment, stability, meniscus and surrounding joint condition can support a preservation plan.

Age alone does not decide the operation, but disease distribution, bone quality, expectations and capacity for protected rehabilitation all change the balance.

When replacement may be more honest

Diffuse severe arthritis can make focal repair disproportionate

CartiHeal is not indicated for severe Kellgren–Lawrence grade 4 osteoarthritis. Widespread bone-on-bone disease, major deformity, instability or multiple pain-generating compartments can make replacement the more reliable and proportionate route.

The CartiHeal trial reported fewer replacements or osteotomies than its control arm at five years, but that does not prove the implant prevents or permanently delays replacement for an individual patient.

The best joint-preserving decision includes recognising when preservation is no longer the sensible objective.

Replacement signals

When focal repair may be too small an answer

Diffuse joint-surface loss

Several broad worn areas may not be served by treating one focal site.

Severe KL4 arthritis

CartiHeal is not indicated for this end-stage radiographic pattern.

Major deformity or instability

Whole-joint mechanics may dominate more than one repairable defect.

Reliability over preservation

A replacement can be more proportionate when disease is broad and advanced.

Side-by-side

Focal biological repair or joint resurfacing?

Question
CartiHeal
Knee replacement
Primary target
Selected cartilage or osteochondral lesion
Worn joint compartment or whole knee
Native joint
Preserved outside prepared sites
Damaged surfaces resected and resurfaced
Biology
Scaffold integration and remodelling
Mechanical prosthetic articulation
Severe KL4 OA
Not indicated
May be appropriate when symptoms and function justify it
Main question
Is focal repair proportionate?
Is joint resurfacing now the more reliable route?
Clinician and patient comparing a native knee MRI with total knee replacement imaging

CartiHeal and knee replacement questions

Can CartiHeal replace a knee replacement?

Not generally. CartiHeal treats selected cartilage and osteochondral lesions; replacement resurfaces diffuse or compartmental joint disease.

Can CartiHeal treat bone-on-bone arthritis?

It is not indicated for severe Kellgren–Lawrence grade 4 osteoarthritis. The extent and distribution of disease must be assessed rather than inferred from the phrase “bone on bone” alone.

Does CartiHeal guarantee I will avoid knee replacement?

No. It cannot guarantee that arthritis will not progress or that future replacement will be avoided.

Is age the deciding factor?

No. Lesion pattern, whole-joint disease, alignment, stability, function, goals, health and rehabilitation capacity all influence the choice.

Still have more specific concerns?

Free Discovery Call

Options that our doctors may discuss include NanoACi, ChondroFiller, Mytocel MSK, joint replacement, established conservative care or surgery, depending on examination and imaging.

Find out whether focal repair remains credible

Professor Lee can review the disease pattern, mechanics and goals before comparing CartiHeal with partial or total knee replacement.

Privacy & Cookies Policy