Knee pain is a common complaint, and it can stem from several different structures within the joint. Two frequent causes of pain on the inner (medial) side of the knee are pes anserinus disorders and meniscal injuries. The pes anserinus is where three muscle tendons meet and attach to the inner upper part of the shinbone, while the meniscus is a special cartilage inside the knee that acts as a shock absorber. Although these structures are quite different, the pain they cause often feels very similar—making accurate diagnosis a real challenge. In this article, we’ll break down the key differences between these conditions, explain why they’re often confused, and explore how doctors distinguish one from the other using current best practices.
The pes anserinus—literally “goose’s foot”—is formed by the tendons of three muscles: the sartorius, gracilis, and semitendinosus. These tendons come together and attach to the upper inner side of the shinbone (tibia), playing a role in stabilizing the knee and guiding its movement. When this area becomes irritated or inflamed, a condition known as pes anserine bursitis or tendinopathy can develop. This typically causes pain on the inside of the knee, especially with activities like climbing stairs or standing for long periods. Because the pes anserinus sits so close to other knee structures, discomfort here can easily be confused with other conditions. Understanding this anatomy is crucial for accurate assessment.
The meniscus is a C-shaped wedge of cartilage deep inside the knee that cushions and distributes body weight across the joint. Each knee has two menisci: one on the inside (medial) and one on the outside (lateral). Meniscus injuries can happen suddenly (from twisting or trauma) or gradually (from age-related wear and tear). Typical symptoms include joint line pain, swelling, and sometimes catching or locking of the knee. Meniscus injuries are often visible on MRI scans, making diagnosis easier, but their symptoms can still overlap with those from pes anserinus problems.
The challenge in diagnosing medial knee pain lies in the fact that both pes anserinus disorders and medial meniscus tears can produce very similar symptoms: inner knee pain and tenderness. This similarity can make it difficult for clinicians to pinpoint the exact source of pain through examination alone. Imaging studies like ultrasound have shown that inflammation of the pes anserine bursa—a small fluid-filled sac near the tendons—can cause discomfort that closely mimics a meniscus injury. As a result, misdiagnosis is common, potentially leading to delays in appropriate treatment. This overlap highlights just how important it is to use a careful and thorough approach.
To accurately identify the source of pain, doctors rely on a mix of physical examination, patient history, and advanced imaging. They will carefully palpate the area where the pes anserinus tendons attach to identify tenderness, and use specific maneuvers like the McMurray test to check the meniscus. While helpful, these physical tests aren’t always definitive. That’s where imaging comes in: ultrasound is particularly useful for spotting swelling or inflammation around the pes anserinus, suggesting bursitis rather than a meniscal tear. In contrast, MRI is better for visualizing meniscal injuries inside the joint. Details from the patient’s history, such as the onset of pain and the types of movements that worsen it, provide further guidance. With ongoing advances in imaging and examination methods, clinicians are getting better at making the correct diagnosis.
Treatment for medial knee pain is tailored to the underlying problem, making an accurate diagnosis especially important. Pes anserinus disorders are generally managed with conservative care, such as physical therapy to strengthen and stretch the surrounding muscles, and anti-inflammatory medications. If symptoms persist, corticosteroid injections may be considered, and surgical intervention is rarely needed. Meniscal injuries, on the other hand, may require arthroscopic surgical repair or partial removal of damaged cartilage, followed by rehabilitation. However, preserving as much meniscus as possible is important, as losing it increases the risk of long-term joint degeneration. The best outcomes come from matching the treatment to the correct source of pain—which is only possible with a precise diagnosis.
Getting the diagnosis right is critical: if pes anserinus conditions are mistaken for meniscal injuries, or vice versa, patients may receive the wrong treatment and experience delayed relief. For this reason, successful care depends on a thorough understanding of knee anatomy, careful examination, and the intelligent use of imaging. As technology evolves and research deepens our understanding, doctors will be better equipped to distinguish between these conditions, leading to faster, more effective treatments and improved outcomes for patients.
Distinguishing pes anserinus disorders from meniscal injuries is essential for managing inner knee pain effectively. Although these problems affect different anatomical structures, the symptoms often blur together. By combining detailed patient histories, focused physical exams, and advanced imaging, clinicians can make accurate diagnoses and select the right treatments. Ongoing research and growing awareness continue to refine our approach to these often misunderstood knee conditions.
Vaquero, J.J., & Forriol, F. (2019). Meniscus tear surgery and meniscus replacement. EFORT Open Reviews, 4(5), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180058
Cartilage
Knees
Hip
Shoulder